20810202Argumentation and Debate
Course Information
Description
Introduces students to the principles, practices, theories and concepts of argumentation and debate. Students learn how to define an issue, build a case for a position through effective use of reasoning, defend one's position from counterarguments, and the etiquette of civil argument. Students will explore the nature of critical thinking, reasoned decision-making, advocacy skills, and the role that controversy plays in culture.
Total Credits
3
Course Competencies
-
Analyze theories and forms of argumentationAssessment Strategiesby applying the theory of forms of argumentation in written and oral communicationCriteriaidentify, analyze and differentiate controversial issues of fact, value and policydefine deductive and inductive forms of argumentidentify a given persuasive situation and message for motivational potential and for actual motivational appealsyou orally critique, refute and rebut another's arguments
-
Construct persuasive messages for given situations and issuesAssessment Strategiesby writing persuasive speechesby writing critiques of classmate's performancesCriteriawrite persuasive messages that are: logically defendable, motivationally appealing, ethically acceptable to the student, culturally appropriatewrite peer evaluations that apply principles of argumentation to student presentations
-
Use research-based evidenceAssessment Strategiesby writing persuasive speeches based on cited sourcesCriteriasupport propositions with evidence to create effective argumentsresearch controversial issues to discover evidenceuse evidence to create a debate resolution out of a controversial issueresearch, prepare and rehearse messages prior to their delivery in the classroomjudge credibility of sources and reliability of claims in supporting claims
-
Evaluate the ethical implications of public argumentationAssessment Strategiesby evaluating your own performance for the purpose of self-improvement (self-assessment)Criteriaanalyze and evaluate given examples of public argument for: structure, adequacy of proof, use of fallacious reasoning, strengths and weaknesses in logicconduct an audience analysis on a controversial issuedemonstrate awareness of audiences' needs and expectations