20809261Elementary Logic
Course Information
Description
A course in contemporary formal (symbolic) logic covering both propositional and predicate logic with identity. Students will learn to represent English sentences into symbolic notation and then test or demonstrate validity using truth tables, a derivation system, truth trees, and counter examples.
Fulfills the Quantitative Reasoning Part B requirement at UW-Madison, as well as the logic requirement at Edgewood College. Assumes a solid background in Algebra. For a course focused on critical thinking and informal logic, see course #20809264, Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking (previously called Reason in Communication), which fulfills the Quantitative Reasoning Part A requirement at UW-Madison as well as the logic requirement at Edgewood College.
Total Credits
4
Course Competencies
-
Explain symbolic logic, the study of formal reasoningAssessment StrategiesOral or written productCriteriaDescribe inference rulesDefine components of an argumentAnalyze the logical relationships between premises and the conclusionExplain how to derive the conclusion from the premises
-
Represent arguments into symbolic notationAssessment StrategiesOral or written productCriteriaRepresent English sentences into symbolic notationIdentify ambiguities in English sentencesSymbolize English sentences into the formal language in a way that accurately represents the original English
-
Analyze methods for proving that an argument is either valid or invalidAssessment StrategiesOral or written productCriteriaDifferentiate between the form of arguments and content of argumentsTest validity using the truth table procedureDemonstrate validity using a deductive procedureGenerate a counterexample when the argument is invalid
-
Use both propositional and predicate logicAssessment StrategiesOral or written productCriteriaDefine propositional and predicate logicSymbolize sentences to determine various propertiesDescribe the distinctive features of propositional logicUtilize the groundwork of propositional logic into constructing predicate logic
-
Use a derivation systemAssessment StrategiesOral or written productCriteriaUse derivation rules correctly in both propositional and predicate logicDetermine the relationships between formal sentencesWhen valid, provide a proof of the conclusion from the premisesUse symbolic language to determine the logical relationships between various formal sentences
-
Test or determine validity using truth tables, a derivation system, truth trees, and counterexamplesAssessment StrategiesOral or written productCriteriaFind the invalidating row on a truth table to provide a formal counterexampleUse truth tables to discover the relationship between individual sentences and other formal sentencesUse all inference rules correctly to prove the conclusion follows from the premisesIf using truth trees, be able to identify closed and open trees and their significanceIf the argument is invalid be able to provide a counterexample