10504901Constitutional Law
Course Information
Description
In this course, learners will diagram the structure of the criminal justice system, identify situations where constitutional rules are applicable, identify situations where an officer may use reasonable suspicion to contact a subject, identify the elements of a lawful arrest, identify search-related activities where the 4th amendment is not applicable, identify the requirements that pertain to search warrants, analyze situations where an officer may conduct a search without a warrant, compare the requirements for conducting routine searches with those for searching disabled persons and strip searches, identify the requirements of the laws governing confessions and statements, and analyze the various requirements that evidence must meet before it can be admitted in court.This course consists of competencies and learning objectives from the following blocks of instruction from the Law Enforcement Standards Board 520 hour Law Enforcement Basic Training Curriculum: Constitutional Law - 30 hours
Total Credits
3
Course Competencies
-
Diagram the structure of the criminal justice system.Assessment Strategiesby creating a diagram of the structure of the criminal justice systemCriteriathe diagram shows units of the criminal justice systemeach unit marker lists examples of included agenciesthe diagram shows how various units of the system are relatedthe diagram uses arrows to convey how the system worksunits are arranged in a pattern that best represents the informationthe diagram includes enough units to adequately represent the systemthe diagram is neat, legible, free of errors and has a professional lookthe diagram is turned in, with a scoring guide, by the assigned due date
-
Identify situations where constitutional rules are applicable.Assessment Strategiesby preparing a written outline of the situations where officers have violated Constitutional rulesCriteriaoutline is prepared using the standard outline formatoutline includes at least seven types of rule violationsoutline includes only relevant and necessary detailsoutline is written in clear phrases or sentences that describes behavior that violates a rule and an analysis of what rule is being brokenoutline is well organized and uses at least first and second level headingsoutline evidences correct grammar, punctuation, and spellingoutline is prepared in advance of the due date/time and student participates in classroom discussion
-
Identify situations where an officer may use reasonable suspicion to contact a subject.Assessment Strategiesby writing and acting out a scenario involving an officer contacting a subject based on reasonable suspicion.Criteriascenario is appropriate to the situationscenario facts as portrayed lead viewers to the appropriate conclusion about the officer's actionsscenario presents an appropriate level challenge to the classscenario portrayal follows the script presented to the instructorofficer dialog is descriptive enough to convey information to the classscenario correctly portrays a situation that either meets or does not meet the standard of reasonable suspicionrole-play meets the time requirementsaudience can easily see and hear the role-playteam is prepared, paperwork is completed and turned in with scoring guide at the assigned presentation time.
-
Identify the elements of a lawful arrest.Assessment Strategiesby preparing an arrest warrant affidavit based on a simulated situationby drafting and acting out a scenario involving an officer arresting a subject based on probable causeCriteriaaffidavit establishes probable cause to believe the named person committed a particular crimeaffidavit details how the officer establishes probable causeaffidavit describes specifically the person to be arrestedaffidavit adequately addresses each element of the crimeaffidavit is written in a logical and easy to understand wayaffidavit is typed, neat, uses correct grammar and is free of errorsaffidavit is turned in with a completed scoring guide, by the assigned due datescenario is appropriate to the assignmentscenario facts as portrayed lead viewers to the appropriate conclusion about the officer's actions.scenario presents an appropriate level challenge to the class.scenario portrayal follows the script presented to the instructor.narrator dialog is descriptive enough to convey information to the class.scenario correctly portrays a situation that either meets or does not meet the standard of probable cause.role-play meets the time requirements.audience can easily see and hear the role-play.
-
Identify search-related activities where the 4th amendment is not applicable.Assessment Strategiesby completing an analysis of several search-related activities and documenting in a written analysis paper where the 4th amendment is not applicableCriteriareport identifies the main search related themes that are addressed by the 4th amendmentreport includes a description of the most common search-related activities not covered by the 4th amendmentreport clarifies exactly why the 4th amendment is not applicable in the above mentioned situationsreport is well organizedreport evidences correct grammar, punctuation, and spellingreport is prepared in advance of the due date/time and student participates in classroom discussion
-
Identify the requirements that pertain to search warrants.Assessment Strategiesby preparing a search warrant affidavit for a given scenarioby creating an outline of the critical elements to be coveredCriteriaaffidavit establishes probable cause to believe that the item of interest is in a particular locationaffidavit details how the officer establishes probable causeaffidavit describes specifically the item to be searched foraffidavit describes specifically the place to be searchedaffidavit is written in a logical and easy to understand wayaffidavit is typed, neat, uses correct grammar and is free of errorsaffidavit is turned in with a completed scoring guide, by the assigned due date
-
Analyze situations where an officer may conduct a search without a warrant.Assessment Strategiesby preparing a written outline of the situations where officers may search without a warrantCriteriaoutline is prepared using the standard outline formatoutline includes at least six exceptionsoutline includes only relevant and necessary detailsoutline is written in clear phrases or sentences that describe exceptions and scenarios that illustrate the exceptionsoutline is well organized and uses at least first and second level headingsoutline evidences correct grammar, punctuation, and spellingoutline is prepared in advance of the due date/time and student participates in classroom discussion
-
Compare the requirements for conducting routine searches with those for searching disabled persons and strip searches.Assessment Strategiesby comparing the requirements for conducting routine searches with those for searching disabled persons and reporting your findings in a paperCriteriacomparison is based on important features or attributescomparison includes the similarities between the itemscomparison includes the differences between the itemscomparison includes logical conclusions drawn from the comparisoncomparison is neat and presentablecomparison evidences correct grammar, punctuation and spelling
-
Identify the requirements of the laws governing confessions and statements.Assessment Strategiesby preparing a written case study report of the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda vs. ArizonaCriteriacase study outlines the key elements of the Miranda casecase study outlines the key elements of the Miranda decisioncase study specifies the key rules for police interrogators laid out by the Miranda rulingcase study outlines the key Supreme Court decisions that have modified or further interpreted the original Miranda rulingcase study outlines the key Supreme Court decisions that have extended additional protections to juvenilescase study response is well organizedcase study response evidences correct grammar, punctuation, and spellingcase study is prepared in advance of the due date/time and student participates in classroom discussion
-
Analyze the various requirements that evidence must meet before it can be admitted in court.Assessment Strategiesby conducting a show-up to identify a subjectCriteriascenario/simulation is appropriate for a justifiable investigative detention and show-upofficer obtains accurate description before show-up is conductedwitness instructions are properly givenofficer avoids suggestive words or conductofficer conducts appropriate post identification interview and completes necessary paperworksituation (scenario/simulation) is properly documented in standard report formatreport evidences correct grammar, punctuation, and spellingreport is submitted, with completed scoring guide, to instructor by assigned due date